Leaderboard/Reya Perps

Reya Perps

C+RiskDValue|$23MTVL|DerivativesWebsite →

Elevated risk — innovative based rollup perp DEX with novel collateral model, offset by untested architecture, zero-fee sustainability concerns, and yield-bearing collateral correlation risk.

Top Risks

1

Reya is built as a based rollup powered by zk-proofs on Ethereum, offering 1ms execution speed with zero trading fees. The based rollup architecture is novel and relatively untested in production for high-frequency trading workloads, introducing potential liveness and data availability risks.

2

Zero maker and taker fees eliminate a primary revenue source. The protocol must sustain operations and security through alternative means (token emissions, ecosystem fees, or future fee introduction), creating long-term sustainability uncertainty.

3

The protocol supports yield-bearing collateral (srUSD, wstETH) as margin. While capital-efficient, using yield-bearing tokens as collateral introduces price correlation risk — if the underlying yield-bearing asset depegs or loses value, margin positions may be simultaneously under-collateralized.

4

Full self-custody design means margin is locked by smart contract until positions are closed. During extreme market conditions, users cannot access their collateral for emergency exits, relying entirely on the protocol's liquidation mechanics to manage risk.

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Reya Perps safe to use?
Reya Perps receives a C+ risk grade (38/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — innovative based rollup perp DEX with novel collateral model, offset by untested architecture, zero-fee sustainability concerns, and yield-bearing collateral correlation risk. Reya Perps is a perpetual futures DEX built as a based rollup on Ethereum, delivering 1ms execution speed with zero trading fees and full self-custody. It uniquely accepts yield-bearing collateral (wstETH, srUSD) as margin, allowing traders to earn yield while maintaining open positions. With $24M in TVL and $103B+ in cumulative volume, its C+ grade reflects novel based rollup architecture and yield-bearing collateral model offset by sustainability concerns from zero fees and limited operational track record.
What are the main risks of using Reya Perps?
The key risks identified for Reya Perps are: (1) Reya's based rollup architecture is novel and relatively untested for high-frequency trading. During extreme market conditions, liveness or settlement delays could prevent timely liquidations, leading to bad debt accumulation. (2) The protocol supports yield-bearing tokens (wstETH, srUSD) as trading collateral. If these tokens depeg, all positions using them as margin face simultaneous collateral devaluation and potential cascade liquidation. (3) Reya charges zero maker and taker fees, which raises questions about long-term sustainability. The protocol must find alternative revenue sources or eventually introduce fees, which could disrupt the user base. (4) Margin is locked by smart contract until positions are closed. During protocol issues or extreme volatility, users cannot access their collateral for emergency exits, relying entirely on the protocol's liquidation system.
What is Reya Perps's risk score breakdown?
Reya Perps scores 38/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 6/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 4/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 5/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Oracle Surface at 5/10.
How does Reya Perps compare to other Derivatives protocols?
Among 53 rated Derivatives protocols on Hindenrank, Reya Perps ranks #27 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 38/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of Derivatives protocols.
Has Reya Perps ever been hacked or exploited?
Reya Perps scores 4/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-15