//RHEA LST
B

RHEA LST

Risk Score 26/100·C-Value
Compare
$17MTVL·Liquid StakingWebsite →

Moderate risk — standard liquid staking model with beneficial DEX and lending integration, but smaller scale and merger-related integration risk warrant attention.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

RHEA Finance is the result of a merger between Ref Finance (DEX) and Burrow Finance (lending) — integration complexity from combining two codebases introduces potential for new bugs at the interface layer

2

As a smaller NEAR liquid staking provider ($12M vs Stader's $321M and LiNEAR's $29M), rNEAR has limited secondary market liquidity and DeFi composability compared to dominant NEAR LSTs

3

Epoch-based staking means NEAR is not immediately staked upon deposit, and rewards only begin at the next epoch boundary, creating yield gaps for depositors

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RHEA LST safe to use?
RHEA LST receives a B risk grade (26/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — standard liquid staking model with beneficial DEX and lending integration, but smaller scale and merger-related integration risk warrant attention. RHEA LST is a liquid staking product on the NEAR blockchain from Rhea Finance, which was formed by merging Ref Finance (NEAR's largest DEX) and Burrow Finance (NEAR lending protocol). Users stake NEAR and receive rNEAR, a yield-bearing token that can also be used as collateral in Rhea's integrated lending markets. With $12M TVL, it's a smaller but vertically integrated competitor in the NEAR liquid staking space.
What are the main risks of using RHEA LST?
The key risks identified for RHEA LST are: (1) rNEAR has lower secondary market liquidity compared to dominant NEAR LSTs like LiNEAR and Stader, meaning you may face slippage when trying to sell large amounts quickly (2) The ability to use rNEAR as collateral for borrowing enables leveraged staking — if NEAR price drops sharply, leveraged positions can be liquidated in a cascade (3) Rhea Finance was formed from a merger of two separate protocols, and the integration of different codebases could introduce unexpected bugs at the interface layer
What is RHEA LST's risk score breakdown?
RHEA LST scores 26/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 3/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 7/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 4/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 7/15.
How does RHEA LST compare to other Liquid Staking protocols?
Among 83 rated Liquid Staking protocols on Hindenrank, RHEA LST ranks #15 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 26/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer Liquid Staking protocols.
Has RHEA LST ever been hacked or exploited?
RHEA LST scores 7/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.