Sanctum Infinity
Moderate risk — innovative basket diversification reduces single-validator risk, but the meta-LST design creates a novel contagion pathway where one bad apple spoils the pool
Top Risks
1
A single compromised LST in the Infinity basket can drain value from the entire pool if not detected quickly
2
Pool relies on on-chain exchange rate oracles from each constituent LST's stake pool — a manipulated rate could enable theft
3
Basket composition changes affect risk profile without depositor consent; new LSTs can be added that introduce unknown risks
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sanctum Infinity safe to use?
Sanctum Infinity receives a B risk grade (26/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — innovative basket diversification reduces single-validator risk, but the meta-LST design creates a novel contagion pathway where one bad apple spoils the pool Sanctum Infinity is a liquid staking pool that holds a basket of Solana LSTs (like JitoSOL, mSOL, bSOL) under a single INF token. Instead of picking one staking provider, INF diversifies across many, spreading validator risk. With $178M in deposits, 3 security audits, and over a year of clean operation, it earns a B grade. The innovation of holding LSTs inside an LST introduces unique risks: if any one constituent token is compromised, the entire pool can be drained.
What are the main risks of using Sanctum Infinity?
The key risks identified for Sanctum Infinity are: (1) INF holds a basket of different staking tokens. If any one of those tokens gets exploited or loses value, it poisons the entire pool and every INF holder takes the loss (2) The pool prices tokens using on-chain exchange rates. If a staking protocol reports a wrong rate, attackers can deposit overvalued tokens and drain the good ones (3) During a Solana network crisis, all the staking tokens in the basket might lose value at the same time, eliminating the diversification benefit when you need it most
What is Sanctum Infinity's risk score breakdown?
Sanctum Infinity scores 26/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 5/15, Interaction Severity: 5/20, Oracle Surface: 1/10, Documentation Gaps: 1/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 5/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 4/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 5/10.
How does Sanctum Infinity compare to other Liquid Staking protocols?
Among 81 rated Liquid Staking protocols on Hindenrank, Sanctum Infinity ranks #20 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 26/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer Liquid Staking protocols.
Has Sanctum Infinity ever been hacked or exploited?
Sanctum Infinity scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26