SerumMicro-cap

CRiskFValue|$15MTVL$48MFDV|DEXWebsite →

Elevated risk — abandoned protocol with realized centralization failure; serves as a cautionary example of upgrade authority and token concentration risks in DeFi.

Limited public documentation — analysis may be incomplete.

Top Risks

1

Protocol is effectively abandoned after FTX collapse — the upgrade authority key was controlled by FTX, and the community forked to OpenBook rather than continuing Serum development

2

FTX/Alameda held approximately 97% of SRM token supply, creating extreme centralization that was fully realized when the exchange collapsed

3

No active development, maintenance, or security monitoring — any remaining TVL faces smart contract risk with no team available to patch vulnerabilities

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Serum safe to use?
Serum receives a C risk grade (45/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — abandoned protocol with realized centralization failure; serves as a cautionary example of upgrade authority and token concentration risks in DeFi. Serum was a pioneering on-chain central limit order book (CLOB) on Solana that served as the shared liquidity layer for much of Solana's DeFi ecosystem. After the FTX collapse in November 2022, the protocol was effectively abandoned because FTX controlled the program upgrade key and held 97% of the SRM token supply. The community forked the protocol to OpenBook, and Serum's TVL collapsed from $121.7M to under $500K. It received a C+ risk grade primarily due to its catastrophic track record and abandoned state, despite the original technical design being relatively straightforward.
What are the main risks of using Serum?
The key risks identified for Serum are: (1) Abandoned protocol: Serum has no active development team, security monitoring, or maintenance since the FTX collapse in November 2022. Any remaining funds in the contracts face unpatched vulnerability risk with no one available to fix issues. (2) Centralization failure realized: FTX controlled the program upgrade key for Serum, meaning one entity could unilaterally modify the protocol. This exact centralization risk materialized catastrophically during the FTX collapse, demonstrating why upgrade authority decentralization matters. (3) Token concentration: FTX and Alameda Research held approximately 97% of all SRM tokens, making it one of the most concentrated token distributions in major DeFi history. SRM has lost over 99% of its value and has minimal utility.
What is Serum's risk score breakdown?
Serum scores 45/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 7/10, Track Record: 15/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 15/15.
How does Serum compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, Serum ranks #99 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 45/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier DEX protocols.
Has Serum ever been hacked or exploited?
Serum scores 15/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-19