Moderate risk — novel audit-plus-insurance model, but the pool is under-collateralized by design and audit failures directly threaten solvency
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Under-collateralized insurance model: staking pool reserves ($60M) can be overwhelmed by correlated exploit events across multiple covered protocols, forcing staker principal slashing
Skin-in-the-game model creates perverse incentives: Sherlock only covers protocols it audits, so systematic audit methodology failures cascade to insurance solvency
Coverage caps ($10M per protocol) are inadequate for large DeFi protocols, creating moral hazard where Sherlock insures 5% of risk but collects 2% premium on 100% of TVL
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sherlock safe to use?
What are the main risks of using Sherlock?
What is Sherlock's risk score breakdown?
How does Sherlock compare to other DeFi protocols?
Has Sherlock ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.