Leaderboard/Sovryn Zero

Sovryn ZeroMicro-cap

BRiskDValue|$22MTVL$4MFDV|CDPWebsite →

Moderate risk — proven Liquity CDP design adapted for Bitcoin provides strong fundamentals, balanced by RSK sidechain infrastructure risk and concentrated ZUSD liquidity within the Sovryn ecosystem.

Top Risks

1

Sovryn Zero operates on Rootstock (RSK), a Bitcoin sidechain with a federated peg and smaller validator set compared to Ethereum, introducing infrastructure-level centralization risk.

2

The 110% minimum collateral ratio provides minimal buffer during sharp BTC price declines, and liquidation infrastructure on RSK may be thinner than on Ethereum where Liquity originally operates.

3

ZUSD stablecoin has limited use cases outside the Sovryn ecosystem, creating liquidity concentration and potential peg fragility if the primary Sovryn DEX experiences issues.

4

The 5% origination fee is significantly higher than many competing CDP protocols, which may push users toward riskier alternatives or incentivize behavior to minimize fee impact.

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sovryn Zero safe to use?
Sovryn Zero receives a B risk grade (26/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — proven Liquity CDP design adapted for Bitcoin provides strong fundamentals, balanced by RSK sidechain infrastructure risk and concentrated ZUSD liquidity within the Sovryn ecosystem. Sovryn Zero is a Bitcoin-native CDP protocol on Rootstock (RSK) that lets users borrow ZUSD stablecoins against BTC collateral with zero interest and a one-time 5% origination fee. With $23M in TVL and a Liquity-based design, its B grade reflects the proven CDP architecture offset by Rootstock infrastructure risk and limited stablecoin utility outside the Sovryn ecosystem.
What are the main risks of using Sovryn Zero?
The key risks identified for Sovryn Zero are: (1) Your BTC collateral is held as RBTC on the Rootstock sidechain, which uses a federated bridge to represent BTC. If this bridge is compromised, your collateral could lose its peg to BTC. (2) ZUSD stablecoin has limited use cases outside of the Sovryn ecosystem on Rootstock. If you need to exit to USD-backed stablecoins, you depend on the Sovryn DEX having sufficient liquidity. (3) The one-time 5% origination fee is higher than many competing CDP protocols. This fee is non-refundable and applies to every new borrowing.
What is Sovryn Zero's risk score breakdown?
Sovryn Zero scores 26/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 0/15, Interaction Severity: 5/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 6/10.
How does Sovryn Zero compare to other CDP protocols?
Among 25 rated CDP protocols on Hindenrank, Sovryn Zero ranks #4 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 26/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer CDP protocols.
Has Sovryn Zero ever been hacked or exploited?
Sovryn Zero scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-26