//SpookySwap
B

SpookySwapMicro-cap

Risk Score 26/100·DValue
Compare
$659,696TVL·$39,880FDV·DEXWebsite →

Moderate risk — Fantom veteran with loyal users, but the dual-chain migration and near-zero treasury make survival a real question

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Fantom-to-Sonic migration fragments liquidity across two chains simultaneously, enabling competitors to capture market share while SpookySwap struggles with resource allocation and governance paralysis over which chain to prioritize

2

V3 concentrated liquidity complexity mismatches with Fantom/Sonic's retail-heavy LP base; out-of-range positions during volatility cause impermanent loss spikes and LP abandonment, defeating V3 capital efficiency upgrade

3

BOO governance token's $38K market cap provides insufficient treasury to compete with better-funded DEXs on liquidity mining; with under $2 in daily trading volume, the token has no economic role and cannot incentivize LP participation

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SpookySwap safe to use?
SpookySwap receives a B risk grade (26/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — Fantom veteran with loyal users, but the dual-chain migration and near-zero treasury make survival a real question The original flagship exchange on Fantom, now operating on the Sonic blockchain. It holds approximately $660K in deposits across both chains and offers both simple and concentrated liquidity trading pools. Its B grade reflects a technically sound AMM with no smart contract exploits, but the Sonic migration has fragmented its liquidity while competitors start fresh on the new chain.
What are the main risks of using SpookySwap?
The key risks identified for SpookySwap are: (1) Running on both Fantom and Sonic at the same time splits the trading liquidity in half. Neither side has enough depth for good prices, and competitors that pick one chain will beat SpookySwap on both (2) The governance token BOO has a market cap of just $38K with under $2 in daily trading volume. That is not enough to fund liquidity rewards on even one chain, let alone two. The protocol cannot attract depositors (3) The V3 concentrated liquidity upgrade requires constant active management. Sonic's retail-heavy user base is not equipped for this. When positions go out of range, they earn zero fees and take losses
What is SpookySwap's risk score breakdown?
SpookySwap scores 26/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 2/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 4/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 1/10, Vitality Risk: 9/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 9/10.
How does SpookySwap compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 116 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, SpookySwap ranks #27 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 26/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer DEX protocols.
Has SpookySwap ever been hacked or exploited?
SpookySwap scores 4/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-08-01

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.