Stargate V1Micro-cap
Moderate risk — battle-tested bridge with clean security record, though LayerZero dependency and transition to V2 create ongoing considerations for V1 users.
Top Risks
1
LayerZero messaging layer dependency — Stargate's cross-chain transfers rely on LayerZero's relayer and oracle network for message verification
2
Liquidity pool imbalances across chains can lead to delayed or failed transfers when destination pools are depleted
3
V1 is legacy infrastructure as V2 has launched — ongoing maintenance and security attention may decline
4
STG/veSTG governance concentration could allow large holders to direct protocol parameters
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Stargate V1 safe to use?
Stargate V1 receives a B- risk grade (30/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — battle-tested bridge with clean security record, though LayerZero dependency and transition to V2 create ongoing considerations for V1 users. Stargate V1 is the first cross-chain bridge built on LayerZero, enabling native asset transfers (USDC, USDT, ETH) across 80+ chains without wrapping. With ~$11M TVL in V1 pools, it pioneered the Delta algorithm for cross-chain liquidity management and charges a 6bps fee. The B grade reflects its clean track record and strong documentation, though LayerZero dependency and V1's legacy status as V2 scales present considerations.
What are the main risks of using Stargate V1?
The key risks identified for Stargate V1 are: (1) Stargate depends entirely on LayerZero's messaging infrastructure — any LayerZero downtime directly affects all transfers (2) V1 is legacy infrastructure now that V2 has launched — security attention may increasingly focus on V2 (3) STG token is being acquired by LayerZero (conversion to ZRO), creating transition uncertainty
What is Stargate V1's risk score breakdown?
Stargate V1 scores 30/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 5/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 9/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 9/10.
How does Stargate V1 compare to other Bridge protocols?
Among 19 rated Bridge protocols on Hindenrank, Stargate V1 ranks #3 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 30/100 risk score and B- grade place it among the safer Bridge protocols.
Has Stargate V1 ever been hacked or exploited?
Stargate V1 scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-25