Leaderboard/Stargate V2

Stargate V2Micro-cap

B-RiskD+Value|$109MTVL$32,935FDV|BridgeWebsite →

Moderate risk — established bridge infrastructure with strong volume, offset by inherent cross-chain validation risks and governance transition uncertainty from the LayerZero acquisition.

Top Risks

1

Stargate V2 relies on LayerZero messaging with two DVNs (Nethermind and LayerZero) for validation; if both collude, fraudulent messages could drain liquidity pools

2

The Stargate DAO voted in August 2025 to accept LayerZero's $110M acquisition, dissolving the DAO. This introduces governance uncertainty during transition

3

Cross-chain liquidity pools can experience imbalance when transfer volume is heavily directional, increasing slippage for LPs

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Stargate V2 safe to use?
Stargate V2 receives a B- risk grade (32/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — established bridge infrastructure with strong volume, offset by inherent cross-chain validation risks and governance transition uncertainty from the LayerZero acquisition. Stargate V2 is a cross-chain bridge with $125M TVL built on LayerZero messaging, enabling token transfers across 20+ blockchains. Its B grade reflects established bridge infrastructure with 3+ years of operation and $4B+ monthly volume, balanced by inherent cross-chain validation risks and governance uncertainty following the LayerZero acquisition in August 2025.
What are the main risks of using Stargate V2?
The key risks identified for Stargate V2 are: (1) Stargate relies on two validation services to verify cross-chain messages. If both are compromised, funds in liquidity pools could be stolen. Bridge exploits have historically caused some of DeFi's largest losses. (2) The Stargate DAO was dissolved in August 2025 after accepting LayerZero's $110M acquisition. Governance and security oversight may be less decentralized during the transition. (3) Liquidity providers may experience temporary losses when bridging volume is heavily one-directional, as pools get depleted on popular destination chains.
What is Stargate V2's risk score breakdown?
Stargate V2 scores 32/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 2/10, Documentation Gaps: 2/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 5/10, Regulatory Risk: 3/10, Vitality Risk: 8/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 8/10.
How does Stargate V2 compare to other Bridge protocols?
Among 19 rated Bridge protocols on Hindenrank, Stargate V2 ranks #5 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 32/100 risk score and B- grade place it among the safer Bridge protocols.
Has Stargate V2 ever been hacked or exploited?
Stargate V2 scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-27