Leaderboard/SushiSwap

SushiSwap

C+RiskC+Value|$43MTVL$61MFDV|DEXWebsite →

Moderate risk — still functional across 40+ chains, but the massive TVL decline, past exploits, and sprawling attack surface raise real sustainability concerns

Top Risks

1

RouterProcessor2 exploit in April 2023 resulted in $3.3M loss across 14 chains due to approval-related vulnerability

2

MISO launchpad suffered $3M supply chain attack via malicious code injection from anonymous contractor

3

TVL has collapsed 99% from 2021 peak, raising protocol continuity and developer retention concerns

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SushiSwap safe to use?
SushiSwap receives a C+ risk grade (36/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — still functional across 40+ chains, but the massive TVL decline, past exploits, and sprawling attack surface raise real sustainability concerns One of the earliest DeFi exchanges, deployed across 40+ blockchains with $200M in deposits. It has survived leadership crises, a $3.3M router exploit, and a $3M insider supply-chain attack. Its C+ grade reflects a protocol that keeps running but has lost 99% of its peak TVL and faces ongoing security and sustainability questions.
What are the main risks of using SushiSwap?
The key risks identified for SushiSwap are: (1) The swap router is deployed identically on 40+ chains. A single bug can be exploited across all of them before the team can patch every deployment. This already happened in 2023 with $3.3M in losses (2) An anonymous contractor once injected malicious code into the MISO launchpad and stole $3M. Open-source contribution from unknown developers means this supply-chain attack could happen again (3) TVL has crashed 99% from its 2021 peak. If revenue drops further, the team cannot afford security audits across 40+ chains. Unaudited contracts on low-activity chains become ticking time bombs
What is SushiSwap's risk score breakdown?
SushiSwap scores 36/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 2/15, Interaction Severity: 8/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 12/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 12/15.
How does SushiSwap compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, SushiSwap ranks #65 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 36/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of DEX protocols.
Has SushiSwap ever been hacked or exploited?
SushiSwap scores 12/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.

Incident History

4incidents|$3Mtotal losses
Last scanned 2026-02-26