SyncSwap
Moderate risk — a well-established multi-chain DEX with solid volume history, but liquidity fragmentation across 5+ L2s and pending airdrop dynamics create meaningful uncertainty.
Top Risks
1
Multi-chain deployment across zkSync Era, Sophon, Linea, Scroll, and Taiko fragments liquidity and increases attack surface across multiple L2 rollup implementations
2
SYNC token not yet widely distributed — pending airdrop creates uncertainty about post-TGE sell pressure and TVL retention
3
Dependent on zkSync Era and other L2 infrastructure — zkSync's ZK-proof system and bridge integrity are critical single points of failure for all SyncSwap liquidity
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SyncSwap safe to use?
SyncSwap receives a B- risk grade (32/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — a well-established multi-chain DEX with solid volume history, but liquidity fragmentation across 5+ L2s and pending airdrop dynamics create meaningful uncertainty. SyncSwap is a multi-chain DEX operating on zkSync Era, Linea, Scroll, Sophon, and Taiko — offering both standard and stableswap pools across multiple ZK-rollup L2 networks. With $14M in TVL and over $8 billion in cumulative trading volume, it is one of the largest DEXs in the zkSync ecosystem. The B risk grade reflects its clean security track record and well-understood AMM design, tempered by multi-chain liquidity fragmentation and airdrop-driven TVL uncertainty.
What are the main risks of using SyncSwap?
The key risks identified for SyncSwap are: (1) Your liquidity is spread across multiple L2 chains — each chain has its own bridge and sequencer that could fail independently, putting your assets at risk on that specific chain (2) Much of the current activity may be driven by the upcoming SYNC token airdrop — once the airdrop happens, traders and LPs farming for points may leave, reducing liquidity and yields (3) As an LP, you are exposed to impermanent loss on volatile token pairs, and thinner liquidity on smaller chains means worse price execution for swaps
What is SyncSwap's risk score breakdown?
SyncSwap scores 32/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 4/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 9/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.
How does SyncSwap compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, SyncSwap ranks #53 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 32/100 risk score and B- grade place it in the middle tier of DEX protocols.
Has SyncSwap ever been hacked or exploited?
SyncSwap scores 9/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-21