//Syscoin
C-

Syscoin

Risk Score 55/100·D+Value
Compare
TVL·$11MFDV·L1Website →

Post-exploit L1 with near-zero TVL and collapsed token value; existing bridge architecture has confirmed critical vulnerability requiring comprehensive reaudit before trust can be restored.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

SPV bridge relay was exploited in June 2026, allowing an attacker to mint 5 billion SYS (~$8.56M) without a valid burn on the NEVM side — root cause was unaudited proof-parsing logic.

2

Cross-layer bridge between UTXO L1 and NEVM EVM execution layer is a single point of failure: any relay validation bug can result in unbacked token creation on either side.

3

Token has lost ~95% of value from its all-time high; on-chain TVL is effectively zero, indicating near-complete ecosystem abandonment.

4

Infinite token supply with no hard cap limits long-term scarcity guarantees, and merge-mining incentives can shift if Bitcoin miner participation declines.

5

Code quality controls are weak — the exploited SPV relay code was unaudited, raising concerns about audit coverage of other critical bridge and relay components.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Syscoin safe to use?
Syscoin receives a C- risk grade (55/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Post-exploit L1 with near-zero TVL and collapsed token value; existing bridge architecture has confirmed critical vulnerability requiring comprehensive reaudit before trust can be restored. Syscoin is a dual-layer blockchain combining a Bitcoin-derived UTXO chain (merge-mined for security) with NEVM, an Ethereum-compatible execution layer. It was exploited in June 2026 when an attacker submitted a malformed SPV proof, minting 5 billion unbacked SYS tokens. The ecosystem has effectively wound down — TVL is zero and the SYS token has lost 95% of its all-time high value. It remains a cautionary example of how unaudited cross-layer bridge code creates catastrophic vulnerability even in protocols with otherwise robust designs.
What are the main risks of using Syscoin?
The key risks identified for Syscoin are: (1) The SPV bridge relay was exploited in June 2026 for $8.56M in unbacked token minting — similar attacks could recur if the rewritten relay code has remaining vulnerabilities (2) SYS token has no hard supply cap and has lost 95% of its value; with near-zero TVL the ecosystem has largely been abandoned by users and developers (3) Merge-mining security depends on Bitcoin miners voluntarily participating; if major pools drop support, the chain becomes vulnerable to cheap 51% attacks
What is Syscoin's risk score breakdown?
Syscoin scores 55/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 9/15, Interaction Severity: 13/20, Oracle Surface: 3/10, Documentation Gaps: 6/10, Track Record: 11/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 6/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 11/15.
How does Syscoin compare to other L1 protocols?
Among 58 rated L1 protocols on Hindenrank, Syscoin ranks #56 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 55/100 risk score and C- grade place it among the riskier L1 protocols.
Has Syscoin ever been hacked or exploited?
Syscoin scores 11/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-06-13

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.