//Tangible RWA
C

Tangible RWA

Risk Score 48/100·C-Value
Compare
$43MTVL·RWAWebsite →

Tangible pioneered an ambitious vision of on-chain real estate ownership, but the USDR depeg proved that illiquid RWA backing and DeFi liquidity demands are fundamentally incompatible without robust liquid reserves. The protocol has pivoted to a more focused RWA marketplace model on re.al, but the track record damage, niche chain dependency, and unresolved legal framework questions around tokenized property ownership remain significant concerns. Only suitable for users with high risk tolerance and long time horizons.

Risk Breakdown

Top Risks

1

Tangible's USDR stablecoin suffered a catastrophic 46% depeg in October 2023 when mass redemptions drained all liquid DAI reserves, leaving only illiquid tokenized real estate as backing — demonstrating the fundamental liquidity mismatch in RWA-backed stablecoins.

2

Tokenized real estate relies on SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) legal structures for property title ownership, introducing jurisdictional legal risk, custodial counterparty risk, and the inability to rapidly liquidate assets during market stress.

3

The migration from Polygon to the re.al L2 chain fragments liquidity and introduces dependency on a smaller, less battle-tested blockchain infrastructure with limited ecosystem support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tangible RWA safe to use?
Tangible RWA receives a C risk grade (48/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Tangible pioneered an ambitious vision of on-chain real estate ownership, but the USDR depeg proved that illiquid RWA backing and DeFi liquidity demands are fundamentally incompatible without robust liquid reserves. The protocol has pivoted to a more focused RWA marketplace model on re.al, but the track record damage, niche chain dependency, and unresolved legal framework questions around tokenized property ownership remain significant concerns. Only suitable for users with high risk tolerance and long time horizons. Tangible is a tokenization protocol that brings real-world assets like real estate onto the blockchain through TNFTs (Tangible NFTs). It operates on the re.al L2 chain and lets users buy fractionalized property, earn rental income, and trade RWA tokens. Its USDR stablecoin suffered a major 46% depeg in October 2023.
What are the main risks of using Tangible RWA?
The key risks identified for Tangible RWA are: (1) USDR stablecoin lost nearly half its value in October 2023 when liquid reserves were drained and illiquid real estate couldn't cover redemptions (2) Your ownership of tokenized real estate depends on complex SPV legal structures that haven't been tested in court (3) The protocol moved to a small L2 chain (re.al) with limited liquidity, making it harder to exit positions quickly
What is Tangible RWA's risk score breakdown?
Tangible RWA scores 48/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 8/15, Interaction Severity: 10/20, Oracle Surface: 5/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 10/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 6/10, Vitality Risk: 3/10. The highest risk area is Track Record at 10/15.
How does Tangible RWA compare to other RWA protocols?
Among 73 rated RWA protocols on Hindenrank, Tangible RWA ranks #63 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 48/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier RWA protocols.
Has Tangible RWA ever been hacked or exploited?
Tangible RWA scores 10/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-17

Get risk alerts before it's too late

Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.