Moderate risk — the Telegram distribution channel provides an unmatched consumer moat among L1s, but regulatory risk from Durov's investigation, declining TVL, and token unlock dilution create significant uncertainty about the network's trajectory.
Top Risks
1
TON's value proposition is deeply coupled with Telegram's billion-user platform. Pavel Durov's arrest in France in August 2024 (charged with 12 offenses related to Telegram content moderation) caused TON to drop 20% and TVL to fall 54%. While Durov's travel ban was lifted in November 2025, the investigation is ongoing, and any adverse regulatory outcome for Telegram directly impacts TON.
2
TVL has declined from its June 2024 peak to ~$85M as of early 2026, and the token price has fallen from an ATH of $8.25 to ~$1.35. While development continues actively (Tokenomics 2.0, MoonPay integration), the ecosystem has not yet demonstrated sustained DeFi adoption beyond Telegram Mini App gaming.
3
Token distribution includes 37 million TON unlocking monthly until 2028 (~1.5% of circulating supply per month), creating sustained sell pressure. Approximately 50% of total supply is in circulation, with the remaining half still subject to unlock schedules.
4
The sharding architecture, while designed for massive scalability, adds complexity to cross-shard message passing and state management. As the network scales with Telegram Mini App activity, edge cases in shard coordination could introduce reliability issues.
Risk Breakdown
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TON safe to use?
TON receives a C+ risk grade (37/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Moderate risk — the Telegram distribution channel provides an unmatched consumer moat among L1s, but regulatory risk from Durov's investigation, declining TVL, and token unlock dilution create significant uncertainty about the network's trajectory. TON (The Open Network) is a Layer 1 blockchain originally designed by Telegram's team and now maintained by the TON Foundation, tightly integrated with Telegram's messaging platform of 1 billion+ users. The network uses a PoS consensus with ~350 validators and an innovative infinite sharding architecture designed for massive scalability. With a market cap of ~$3.4 billion and ~$85 million in DeFi TVL, TON is in an early-growth phase, with its primary differentiation being Telegram's exclusive blockchain integration — including a self-custodial wallet available to 87 million US users and MoonPay-enabled cross-chain deposits. The B- grade reflects the Telegram distribution moat and active development (Tokenomics 2.0, Jetton 2.0), offset by significant regulatory risk from Pavel Durov's ongoing French investigation, declining TVL from peak, monthly token unlock dilution, and the network's heavy dependence on a single consumer platform.
What are the main risks of using TON?
The key risks identified for TON are: (1) TON's growth thesis depends almost entirely on Telegram integration. Pavel Durov was arrested in France in August 2024 and charged with 12 offenses related to Telegram's content moderation. While his travel ban was lifted in November 2025, the investigation is ongoing and could result in restrictions on Telegram's crypto functionality. (2) TVL has declined 54% from its June 2024 peak to approximately $85 million, and the token price has dropped from $8.25 to ~$1.35. The ecosystem has not yet demonstrated sustained DeFi adoption, with most activity concentrated in Telegram Mini App gaming rather than financial protocols. (3) Monthly unlocks of 37 million TON (approximately 1.5% of circulating supply) continue until 2028, creating sustained dilution pressure. Only about 50% of total supply is currently in circulation, meaning significant future sell pressure from scheduled releases. (4) TON's infinite sharding architecture is one of the most aggressive scaling designs in production. While designed for Telegram-scale transaction volumes, the dynamic shard creation and cross-shard messaging add complexity that has limited real-world stress testing.
What is TON's risk score breakdown?
TON scores 37/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 5/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 6/15, Scale Exposure: 9/10, Regulatory Risk: 6/10, Vitality Risk: 5/10. The highest risk area is Scale Exposure at 9/10.
How does TON compare to other L1 protocols?
Among 56 rated L1 protocols on Hindenrank, TON ranks #37 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 37/100 risk score and C+ grade place it in the middle tier of L1 protocols.
Has TON ever been hacked or exploited?
TON scores 6/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.