Leaderboard/Turbos Finance

Turbos FinanceMicro-cap

BRiskC-Value|$5MTVL$1MFDV|DEXWebsite →

Lower risk — functional exchange, but concentrated liquidity on a young blockchain amplifies crash exposure and bot exploitation

Top Risks

1

Concentrated liquidity positions face extreme impermanent loss during rapid price movements, with all positions potentially going out-of-range simultaneously

2

JIT liquidity attacks systematically extract fees from passive LPs, eroding the economic viability of providing liquidity on Turbos

3

Security incident requiring Sui validator intervention (asset freezing) contradicted decentralization principles and highlighted chain-level dependency risks

Risk Breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Turbos Finance safe to use?
Turbos Finance receives a B risk grade (26/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Lower risk — functional exchange, but concentrated liquidity on a young blockchain amplifies crash exposure and bot exploitation A decentralized exchange on the Sui blockchain offering concentrated liquidity trading and automated position management. It holds $50M in deposits with $3.75M in funding. Its B- grade reflects the risk that all liquidity can simultaneously go offline during a price crash, plus a past security incident that required Sui validators to freeze user assets.
What are the main risks of using Turbos Finance?
The key risks identified for Turbos Finance are: (1) During a sharp SUI price drop, all trading liquidity can disappear at once -- the exchange becomes unusable exactly when you need to sell most (2) Automated trading bots steal fees from regular liquidity providers, making it unprofitable to deposit unless you run your own bot (3) A past security incident required the Sui blockchain itself to freeze assets, proving your funds are not truly in your control
What is Turbos Finance's risk score breakdown?
Turbos Finance scores 26/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 3/15, Interaction Severity: 6/20, Oracle Surface: 0/10, Documentation Gaps: 3/10, Track Record: 3/15, Scale Exposure: 0/10, Regulatory Risk: 2/10, Vitality Risk: 9/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 9/10.
How does Turbos Finance compare to other DEX protocols?
Among 111 rated DEX protocols on Hindenrank, Turbos Finance ranks #25 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 26/100 risk score and B grade place it among the safer DEX protocols.
Has Turbos Finance ever been hacked or exploited?
Turbos Finance scores 3/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.
Last scanned 2026-02-12