High risk — a February 2026 oracle manipulation exploit proved the Reflector VWAP oracle can be manipulated via thin Stellar DEX liquidity, resulting in a $10.2M pool drain and TVL collapse to under $100K.
Risk Breakdown
Top Risks
Custom VWAP oracle (Reflector) prices collateral assets based on recent Stellar DEX trading volume; in February 2026 an attacker placed a single manipulative trade in the illiquid USTRY/USDC pair to inflate the price 100x, enabling them to borrow the entire pool's reserves (~$10.2M) before any protective mechanism triggered.
Permissionless pool creation allows governance to approve arbitrary collateral assets on Blend; the YieldBlox DAO's approval of USTRY — a low-liquidity Stellar asset with a single market maker — directly created the oracle manipulation surface that enabled the February 2026 exploit.
Post-exploit TVL has collapsed from ~$10M to under $100K, creating severe exit liquidity risk and raising questions about whether the lending pools can attract meaningful capital without oracle infrastructure redesign and restored depositor confidence.
Backstop module insurance was insufficient to cover the $10.2M bad debt from the exploit; full user compensation depends on Script3's organizational resources rather than a protocol-native recovery mechanism, creating an unresolved centralized dependency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is YieldBlox safe to use?
What are the main risks of using YieldBlox?
What is YieldBlox's risk score breakdown?
How does YieldBlox compare to other Lending protocols?
Has YieldBlox ever been hacked or exploited?
Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.