YieldFi

YieldFi receives a C risk grade (46/100) from Hindenrank, where lower scores indicate lower risk. Elevated risk — well-audited yield aggregator simplifying multi-protocol DeFi, but inherits the combined attack surface and counterparty risk of every integrated protocol including Ethena's CEX dependency YieldFi is a yield aggregation platform that simplifies DeFi investing by automatically allocating your deposits across trusted protocols like Aave, Pendle, Morpho, and Ethena. Instead of manually managing positions across multiple protocols, you deposit stablecoins or other assets and receive yield-bearing tokens that grow in value block by block. YieldFi has been audited by Halborn, Spearbit/Cantina, and Cyfrin. The V2 architecture includes timelock-controlled upgrades for additional security, and the V3 is now live with improved vault strategies.

The key risks identified for YieldFi are: (1) Your deposits are spread across multiple DeFi protocols. A hack or exploit in any of those underlying protocols (Pendle, Aave, Morpho, Ethena) could result in losses to your YieldFi vault. (2) Ethena's synthetic dollar (USDe) relies on centralized exchanges for hedging. If a major exchange fails, Ethena exposure in YieldFi vaults could result in losses from USDe depeg. (3) The simple deposit interface masks complex multi-protocol strategies underneath. It is important to understand that you are taking on the combined risk of all integrated protocols, not just YieldFi's smart contracts.

YieldFi scores 46/100 across eight risk dimensions: Mechanism Novelty: 5/15, Interaction Severity: 11/20, Oracle Surface: 4/10, Documentation Gaps: 4/10, Track Record: 8/15, Scale Exposure: 3/10, Regulatory Risk: 4/10, Vitality Risk: 7/10. The highest risk area is Vitality Risk at 7/10.

Among 116 rated Yield protocols on Hindenrank, YieldFi ranks #107 by safety (lowest risk score = safest). Its 46/100 risk score and C grade place it among the riskier Yield protocols.

YieldFi scores 8/15 on the Track Record risk dimension, indicating some history of security incidents or exploits. Higher scores reflect more severe or frequent incidents. Review the full risk report for details.