How Does Stellar Work?
Stellar is a Layer 1 blockchain focused on cross-border payments and asset tokenization, operating since 2015 using the Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP) — a Federated Byzantine Agreement model. With major institutional partnerships including MoneyGram (170+ country cash network), PayPal (PYUSD stablecoin on Stellar), Franklin Templeton (tokenized money market fund), and US Bank (stablecoin testing), Stellar has one of the strongest institutional adoption profiles in crypto. The network's DeFi TVL recently reached an all-time high of $163 million following the launch of Soroban smart contracts in February 2024, expanding capabilities beyond simple payments to lending (Blend) and AMM (Aquarius) protocols. Its B+ grade reflects 10+ years of clean core operation, strong institutional partnerships, and growing DeFi adoption, balanced against the Stellar Development Foundation's concentrated XLM holdings (46% of total supply) and the relatively new Soroban smart contract attack surface.
TVL
$16M
Sector
L1
Risk Grade
B
Value Grade
C
Core Mechanisms
Consensus/FBA
Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP) — Federated Byzantine Agreement where each node selects its own quorum slices (trusted validator sets). Consensus emerges from overlapping quorum slices without a fixed validator set. Currently tolerates 2 tier-1 organization failures, expanding to 4.
SCP has been in production since 2015 with formal academic proofs. The federated trust model is well-understood. While architecturally distinct from PoS, it has 10+ years of production stability.
DEX/Order-Book
Native SDEX (Stellar Decentralized Exchange) — built-in order book DEX supporting any asset pair issued on the network. Pathfinding enables multi-hop trades through XLM as a bridge asset.
The native DEX has been part of Stellar since launch. On-chain order book matching is well-understood. Similar in concept to XRPL's native DEX.
Smart-Contract/VM
Soroban smart contracts — WebAssembly-based smart contract platform written in Rust, launched on mainnet February 2024. Supports programmable assets, DeFi applications, and decentralized identity. 5-second finality, 150 TPS. $100M Soroban adoption fund.
WASM-based smart contracts are a standard pattern (Cosmos SDK chains, Near, Polkadot). Soroban is relatively new (2024) but follows well-established design patterns.
Fee/Burn
Minimal transaction fee burn — transactions require a base fee (currently 100 stroops = 0.00001 XLM) that is collected and partially burned. Fees are designed to be near-zero to support high-volume payment use cases.
Standard fee burning for spam prevention. The near-zero fee design is intentional for the payment use case but limits fee-based value accrual.
Token/Fixed-Supply
Fixed supply of 50 billion XLM — originally 105 billion, reduced to 50 billion after a community vote in 2019 when SDF burned 55 billion tokens. Inflation mechanism permanently disabled. No new XLM can be created.
Fixed supply with no inflation is a clean design. The 2019 burn was a significant governance event that improved tokenomics.
Interoperability/Anchor
Anchor system for fiat on/off ramps — regulated entities (anchors) issue fiat-backed assets on Stellar and handle compliance (KYC/AML). MoneyGram serves as a major anchor enabling cash in/out across 170+ countries. SEP (Stellar Ecosystem Proposals) standardize anchor operations.
The anchor model is a well-established pattern for fiat-crypto bridging. The MoneyGram, PayPal, and Franklin Templeton integrations demonstrate institutional adoption of the pattern.
How the Pieces Interact
SDF holds 46% of total XLM supply and distributes tokens for ecosystem development, anchor onboarding, and Soroban adoption fund ($100M). These distributions function as effective emissions despite the fixed supply, and SDF's discretionary control over distribution timing affects supply dynamics.
Soroban smart contracts interacting with the native SDEX create new composability vectors. A bug in Soroban contract logic could manipulate SDEX order books or exploit the pathfinding mechanism for multi-hop arbitrage that extracts value from liquidity providers.
SCP's quorum-slice-based consensus was designed for simple payment transactions. As Soroban smart contracts increase transaction complexity and execution time, the consensus mechanism may face new performance constraints or state management challenges.
Near-zero transaction fees combined with Soroban smart contract execution could enable spam attacks or resource exhaustion if contract execution costs are not properly metered. The fee model was designed for simple payments, not complex smart contract interactions.
If institutional anchors (MoneyGram, Franklin Templeton) also run validators, they gain dual influence over both consensus and the fiat on/off ramp layer. A regulatory action against an anchor could simultaneously affect validator availability and fiat connectivity.
What Could Go Wrong
- The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) holds approximately 23 billion XLM of the 50 billion total supply (46%), creating significant single-entity concentration. While SDF is a non-profit and distributions fund ecosystem development, this level of concentration gives one entity outsized influence over supply dynamics and ecosystem direction.
- Soroban smart contracts (launched February 2024) are relatively new, with only 2 years of mainnet production. While they expand Stellar's capability beyond payments, the WASM-based contract platform adds new attack surface that has less battle-testing than Stellar's core payment functionality.
- A critical exploit in 2019 allowed an attacker to mint over 2 billion XLM without detection. The vulnerability was patched and the network has operated cleanly since, but it demonstrated that even well-reviewed consensus implementations can harbor critical bugs.
- The SCP (Stellar Consensus Protocol) federated trust model relies on validators choosing their own quorum slices. If tier-1 validator diversity narrows or trust graph topology shifts, the network's fault tolerance could degrade below the current 2-organization tolerance (expanding to 4 in 2025).
Institutional anchor exits degrade network utility
TailTrigger: One or more major anchors (MoneyGram, PayPal, Franklin Templeton) discontinue Stellar integration due to regulatory changes, competitive alternatives, or strategic pivots, reducing the network's fiat connectivity across key corridors
- 1.A major anchor like MoneyGram exits the Stellar network, citing regulatory costs or strategic pivot to a competing blockchain (Ripple, Ethereum) — Cash in/out capabilities degrade in the 170+ country MoneyGram network, removing a key differentiator for Stellar's cross-border payment use case
- 2.Remaining anchor density thins, increasing settlement times and costs for cross-border transfers as fewer on/off ramps serve each corridor — Payment users and remittance providers migrate to alternative rails (USDC on Ethereum/Solana, XRP ODL) with better anchor coverage
- 3.Reduced payment volume decreases network utility; DeFi ecosystem (Blend, Aquarius) loses the payment-driven liquidity that distinguishes Stellar from generic smart contract platforms — Stellar's competitive narrative weakens from 'institutional payment blockchain' to 'generic L1 with modest DeFi,' undermining the valuation premium from institutional partnerships
Risk Profile at a Glance
Overall: B (21/100)
Lower score = safer