Is Endur Safe?

|Liquid Staking
B

Risk Grade: B (26/100)

Endur is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.

Moderate risk — the monopoly LST provider on Starknet with clean architecture, but single-provider dependency and staking infrastructure evolution create concentration and transition risks.

Endur is the only liquid staking protocol on Starknet, letting users stake STRK tokens and receive xSTRK — a liquid token that earns staking rewards while remaining usable across Starknet DeFi. With $14M in TVL and a points-based airdrop campaign, it dominates Starknet's LST market. The B risk grade reflects its clean track record and standard LST architecture, balanced against monopoly provider risk and Starknet staking infrastructure immaturity.

TVL

$13M

Mechanisms

6

Interactions

5

Value Grade

D

Key Risks for Endur Users

1.

Endur is the only liquid staking option on Starknet — if the protocol has a bug or operational issue, there is no alternative provider to fall back to for your staked STRK

2.

Starknet's staking system is still evolving through V2 upgrades — changes to how validators work or earn rewards could temporarily disrupt xSTRK's reward accrual

3.

Points farming has attracted capital that may leave after any token airdrop — if many depositors exit at once, xSTRK could temporarily trade below its fair value on DEXs

Top Risk Factors

  • Only liquid staking provider on Starknet — single-provider dominance creates centralization risk for the entire Starknet staking ecosystem with no competitive alternatives
  • Starknet staking infrastructure is still maturing through V2 upgrades — changes to validator responsibilities and economic models introduce transition risk for delegated stake
  • xSTRK liquidity depends on Starknet DeFi ecosystem depth, which remains limited compared to Ethereum or Solana liquid staking markets

Risk Score Breakdown

Endur's highest risk area is Documentation Gaps (4/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 26/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty3/15
Interaction Severity4/20
Oracle Surface2/10
Documentation Gaps4/10
Track Record4/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk3/10

Read the Full Endur Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.