Is Granite Safe?

|Lending
B-

Risk Grade: B- (32/100)

Granite is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.

Moderate risk — well-designed Bitcoin lending protocol with strong security practices and novel soft liquidation, but sBTC bridge dependency and Stacks throughput constraints are meaningful risk factors.

Granite is a Bitcoin-native lending protocol on Stacks that lets you borrow stablecoins against your Bitcoin (sBTC) without giving up custody. It uses a soft liquidation model that only partially liquidates positions to restore solvency, reducing the impact on borrowers. The protocol has completed multiple audits, runs a bug bounty program, and integrates Pyth oracles for price feeds.

TVL

$27M

Mechanisms

6

Interactions

5

Value Grade

D+

Key Risks for Granite Users

1.

Your collateral is in sBTC, which depends on a threshold signature bridge between Bitcoin and Stacks — if this bridge is compromised, your sBTC collateral could lose its BTC peg

2.

Stacks has slower block times than Ethereum, which means liquidations may execute with delay during rapid Bitcoin price drops, potentially creating bad debt that affects stablecoin depositors

3.

The protocol is relatively new in the Bitcoin DeFi space with limited historical stress-testing during major market downturns

Top Risk Factors

  • Granite depends on sBTC — a non-custodial Bitcoin-backed asset on Stacks secured by Stacks validators via threshold signatures; sBTC bridge security is a critical dependency
  • Pyth oracle integration for Bitcoin price feeds on Stacks introduces oracle dependency; any price feed staleness or manipulation could trigger incorrect liquidations
  • Stacks blockchain has lower throughput and longer block times than EVM chains, which could delay liquidation execution during rapid price declines

Risk Score Breakdown

Granite's highest risk area is Vitality Risk (8/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 32/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty3/15
Interaction Severity3/20
Oracle Surface5/10
Documentation Gaps2/10
Track Record5/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk8/10

Read the Full Granite Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Lending Safety Analyses

Related Lending Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.