Is StakeStone Safe?

|Liquid Staking
C+

Risk Grade: C+ (36/100)

StakeStone is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.

Moderate risk — unified omnichain token is convenient, but the custom bridge and governance-controlled strategies create risks that standard liquid staking tokens avoid

A liquid staking protocol that lets you stake ETH and use the STONE token across multiple blockchains via LayerZero messaging. It holds $300M with $33M in funding. Its C+ grade reflects a custom cross-chain bridge design that deviates from standard patterns, creating unique failure modes for $300M in assets.

TVL

$22M

Mechanisms

8

Interactions

5

Value Grade

D+

Key Risks for StakeStone Users

1.

STONE uses a non-standard bridge that locks tokens on one chain instead of burning them. If this custom mechanism has a bug, fake STONE can be minted on other chains, crashing the price for everyone

2.

A governance vote can send your staked ETH into risky yield strategies. If one strategy gets hacked, all STONE holders across every chain share the loss. You cannot opt out

3.

If LayerZero messaging goes down, STONE holders on Layer 2 chains cannot redeem for ETH. Your tokens become illiquid and trade at a discount until the messaging service comes back

Top Risk Factors

  • Custom cross-chain bridge mechanism (lock-without-burn via LayerZero) creates non-standard attack surface for $300M+ in cross-chain STONE tokens
  • OPAP governance-controlled yield strategy allocation means a single bad strategy can impair all STONE holders across all chains simultaneously
  • Omnichain architecture fragments redemption access — users on L2s and alt-L1s cannot directly redeem STONE for ETH without bridging back to Ethereum

Risk Score Breakdown

StakeStone's highest risk area is Vitality Risk (6/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 36/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty8/15
Interaction Severity8/20
Oracle Surface3/10
Documentation Gaps3/10
Track Record2/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk6/10

Read the Full StakeStone Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 critical and 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.