Is stHYPE Safe?
Risk Grade: B- (29/100)
stHYPE is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.
stHYPE was an early mover in Hyperliquid liquid staking but has lost significant ground to kHYPE. The Valantis acquisition brings new strategic direction but introduces governance uncertainty. Sound technical foundation with open-source audited contracts, but competitive headwinds and ecosystem concentration create meaningful risk. Moderate risk, uncertain trajectory.
stHYPE is a liquid staking token for Hyperliquid's HYPE token. It was the first LST on HyperEVM but has since been surpassed by kHYPE. In August 2025, stHYPE was acquired by Valantis DEX and is being transformed into a modular liquid staking platform. Users stake HYPE and receive stHYPE that can be used across Hyperliquid DeFi.
TVL
$195M
Mechanisms
5
Interactions
4
Value Grade
D
Key Risks for stHYPE Users
stHYPE has been losing market share to competitors — it dropped from $500M to ~$130M TVL, raising questions about long-term viability
The Valantis acquisition means a DEX company now controls your staking provider, which may create conflicts of interest
Your entire investment is tied to the Hyperliquid ecosystem — if HYPE or the chain has problems, stHYPE is directly affected
Top Risk Factors
- •Acquisition by Valantis DEX introduces corporate governance risk and strategic pivot uncertainty for stHYPE holders
- •Market share erosion — stHYPE lost its #1 position to kHYPE, declining from $500M to ~$130M TVL, signaling competitive weakness
- •Hyperliquid ecosystem concentration — stHYPE's value is entirely dependent on HYPE token price and Hyperliquid chain health
How stHYPE Compares to Peers
stHYPE ranks #35 of 86 Liquid Staking protocols (above-median). At a risk score of 29/100, it's 3 points safer than the sector average of 32/100.
Adjacent peers: Veno Finance (B-, 28/100) is ranked just safer, and Hylo LSTs (B-, 29/100) is ranked just riskier.
See the full Liquid Staking sector leaderboard or the stHYPE vs Hylo LSTs comparison.
Common Questions about stHYPE
Plain-English answers based on stHYPE's scores across Hindenrank's 8 risk dimensions. The highest-scoring (riskiest) dimension is Scale Exposure (5/10).
Has stHYPE ever been hacked or exploited?
stHYPE has a fairly clean operational history. The track record dimension scored 3/15, indicating minor or no significant incidents on record. A clean track record is a positive signal but it does not guarantee future safety, especially as protocol complexity grows.
How much money is at stake in stHYPE?
stHYPE currently holds more than $195M in user deposits. A protocol of this size typically has deeper liquidity, more eyes on the code, and more attention from auditors — but it also means a single failure has a much larger blast radius.
What's the worst-case scenario for stHYPE?
Hindenrank has identified specific collapse scenarios for stHYPE. The most prominent: "Competitive Death Spiral to kHYPE". The trigger condition is stHYPE TVL continues declining as users migrate to kHYPE, reaching a critical threshold where DeFi integrations become unviable. Reading through the full scenario list on the protocol page is the single best way to understand the actual failure modes — generic "smart contract risk" is rarely the thing that takes a protocol down.
Is stHYPE regulated or insured?
stHYPE has low regulatory exposure on Hindenrank's framework (3/10). The protocol is structured in a way that minimizes counterparty and jurisdiction concentration, though regulatory risk in crypto can change rapidly. No DeFi protocol carries FDIC-style insurance — even with low regulatory risk, depositors are not protected in the way bank customers are.
What are the biggest red flags for stHYPE?
Hindenrank's retail-focused risk audit flagged: stHYPE has been losing market share to competitors — it dropped from $500M to ~$130M TVL, raising questions about long-term viability The Valantis acquisition means a DEX company now controls your staking provider, which may create conflicts of interest Your entire investment is tied to the Hyperliquid ecosystem — if HYPE or the chain has problems, stHYPE is directly affected
Should beginners deposit into stHYPE?
stHYPE is rated B-, which is acceptable for users who understand the protocol's mechanism. Beginners should read the full risk breakdown and only deposit after they can articulate the top three failure modes. If you cannot explain how the protocol works, do not deposit.
How does stHYPE compare to safer Liquid Staking alternatives?
stHYPE is one protocol in Hindenrank's Liquid Staking coverage. The safest Liquid Staking protocols on the leaderboard tend to share three traits: a long incident-free track record, conservative mechanism design, and high-quality public documentation. Compare stHYPE against the full Liquid Staking ranking before committing capital.
For the full 8-dimension score breakdown, the radar chart, and dependency graph, see the stHYPE risk report.
Read the Full stHYPE Risk Report
This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.
View Full Report →Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.