Is SushiSwap Safe?
Risk Grade: C+ (37/100)
SushiSwap is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.
Moderate risk — still functional across 40+ chains, but the massive TVL decline, past exploits, and sprawling attack surface raise real sustainability concerns
One of the earliest DeFi exchanges, deployed across 40+ blockchains with $200M in deposits. It has survived leadership crises, a $3.3M router exploit, and a $3M insider supply-chain attack. Its C+ grade reflects a protocol that keeps running but has lost 99% of its peak TVL and faces ongoing security and sustainability questions.
TVL
$46M
Mechanisms
8
Interactions
5
Value Grade
C+
Key Risks for SushiSwap Users
The swap router is deployed identically on 40+ chains. A single bug can be exploited across all of them before the team can patch every deployment. This already happened in 2023 with $3.3M in losses
An anonymous contractor once injected malicious code into the MISO launchpad and stole $3M. Open-source contribution from unknown developers means this supply-chain attack could happen again
TVL has crashed 99% from its 2021 peak. If revenue drops further, the team cannot afford security audits across 40+ chains. Unaudited contracts on low-activity chains become ticking time bombs
Top Risk Factors
- •RouterProcessor2 exploit in April 2023 resulted in $3.3M loss across 14 chains due to approval-related vulnerability
- •MISO launchpad suffered $3M supply chain attack via malicious code injection from anonymous contractor
- •TVL has collapsed 99% from 2021 peak, raising protocol continuity and developer retention concerns
How SushiSwap Compares to Peers
SushiSwap ranks #64 of 111 DEX protocols (below-median — riskier than average). At a risk score of 37/100, it's 3 points riskier than the sector average of 34/100.
Adjacent peers: Valantis STEX (C+, 36/100) is ranked just safer, and DefiTuna AMM (C+, 37/100) is ranked just riskier.
See the full DEX sector leaderboard or the SushiSwap vs DefiTuna AMM comparison.
Common Questions about SushiSwap
Plain-English answers based on SushiSwap's scores across Hindenrank's 8 risk dimensions. The highest-scoring (riskiest) dimension is Track Record (12/15).
Has SushiSwap ever been hacked or exploited?
SushiSwap has a documented incident history that materially raised its risk grade — the track record dimension scored 12/15, near the high end of the scale. Past exploits, governance failures, or contract issues are baked into this rating. Anyone considering deposits should review the incident details before allocating capital.
How much money is at stake in SushiSwap?
SushiSwap currently holds roughly $46M in user deposits. Smaller TVL means individual depositors carry a larger share of any loss event, and it can be harder to exit a position quickly during stress.
What's the worst-case scenario for SushiSwap?
Hindenrank has identified specific collapse scenarios for SushiSwap. The most prominent: "Cross-Chain Router Exploit Cascade". The trigger condition is A shared vulnerability in the cross-chain swap router is discovered and exploited across 10+ chains within 24 hours, as demonstrated by the April 2023 RouterProcessor2 incident pattern. Reading through the full scenario list on the protocol page is the single best way to understand the actual failure modes — generic "smart contract risk" is rarely the thing that takes a protocol down.
Is SushiSwap regulated or insured?
SushiSwap has low regulatory exposure on Hindenrank's framework (2/10). The protocol is structured in a way that minimizes counterparty and jurisdiction concentration, though regulatory risk in crypto can change rapidly. No DeFi protocol carries FDIC-style insurance — even with low regulatory risk, depositors are not protected in the way bank customers are.
What are the biggest red flags for SushiSwap?
Hindenrank's retail-focused risk audit flagged: The swap router is deployed identically on 40+ chains. A single bug can be exploited across all of them before the team can patch every deployment. This already happened in 2023 with $3.3M in losses An anonymous contractor once injected malicious code into the MISO launchpad and stole $3M. Open-source contribution from unknown developers means this supply-chain attack could happen again TVL has crashed 99% from its 2021 peak. If revenue drops further, the team cannot afford security audits across 40+ chains. Unaudited contracts on low-activity chains become ticking time bombs
Should beginners deposit into SushiSwap?
SushiSwap's C+ grade puts it in the elevated-risk band. This is not a beginner-friendly protocol. Anyone depositing here should treat the position as speculative and avoid concentrating significant savings in it.
How does SushiSwap compare to safer DEX alternatives?
SushiSwap is one protocol in Hindenrank's DEX coverage. The safest DEX protocols on the leaderboard tend to share three traits: a long incident-free track record, conservative mechanism design, and high-quality public documentation. Compare SushiSwap against the full DEX ranking before committing capital.
For the full 8-dimension score breakdown, the radar chart, and dependency graph, see the SushiSwap risk report.
Read the Full SushiSwap Risk Report
This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 3 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.
View Full Report →Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.