Is SushiSwap Safe?

|DEX
C+

Risk Grade: C+ (36/100)

SushiSwap is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.

Moderate risk — still functional across 40+ chains, but the massive TVL decline, past exploits, and sprawling attack surface raise real sustainability concerns

One of the earliest DeFi exchanges, deployed across 40+ blockchains with $200M in deposits. It has survived leadership crises, a $3.3M router exploit, and a $3M insider supply-chain attack. Its C+ grade reflects a protocol that keeps running but has lost 99% of its peak TVL and faces ongoing security and sustainability questions.

TVL

$43M

Mechanisms

8

Interactions

5

Value Grade

C+

Key Risks for SushiSwap Users

1.

The swap router is deployed identically on 40+ chains. A single bug can be exploited across all of them before the team can patch every deployment. This already happened in 2023 with $3.3M in losses

2.

An anonymous contractor once injected malicious code into the MISO launchpad and stole $3M. Open-source contribution from unknown developers means this supply-chain attack could happen again

3.

TVL has crashed 99% from its 2021 peak. If revenue drops further, the team cannot afford security audits across 40+ chains. Unaudited contracts on low-activity chains become ticking time bombs

Top Risk Factors

  • RouterProcessor2 exploit in April 2023 resulted in $3.3M loss across 14 chains due to approval-related vulnerability
  • MISO launchpad suffered $3M supply chain attack via malicious code injection from anonymous contractor
  • TVL has collapsed 99% from 2021 peak, raising protocol continuity and developer retention concerns

Risk Score Breakdown

SushiSwap's highest risk area is Track Record (12/15). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 36/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty2/15
Interaction Severity8/20
Oracle Surface0/10
Documentation Gaps4/10
Track Record12/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk2/10
Vitality Risk5/10

Read the Full SushiSwap Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 3 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related DEX Safety Analyses

Related DEX Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.