Is VenomStake Safe?
Risk Grade: C+ (40/100)
VenomStake is rated as elevated risk — multiple novel mechanisms and notable interaction risks.
Moderate risk — standard liquid staking design, but very new chain and limited documentation increase uncertainty.
VenomStake is a liquid staking protocol on the Venom blockchain that lets you stake VENOM tokens while receiving a liquid token representing your staked position. With $20M in TVL, it offers standard staking rewards on a relatively new blockchain that launched its mainnet in March 2024. The protocol uses conventional liquid staking mechanics without novel design elements.
TVL
$11M
Mechanisms
5
Interactions
4
Value Grade
D
Key Risks for VenomStake Users
Very new blockchain: Venom launched its mainnet in March 2024, making both the chain and VenomStake among the least battle-tested options in the liquid staking space. New chains are more likely to experience technical issues.
Limited documentation: VenomStake's smart contract details, fee structure, and security audit information are not comprehensively documented publicly, making it harder to assess the protocol's safety.
Small ecosystem: The Venom DeFi ecosystem is still developing, which means your liquid staking token may have limited utility beyond basic staking — reducing the main advantage of liquid staking over native staking.
Top Risk Factors
- •Venom blockchain launched mainnet in March 2024 with under 2 years of production operation, limiting battle-testing of both the chain and the staking protocol
- •Limited documentation for VenomStake itself — staking mechanics and smart contract details are not comprehensively documented publicly
- •Small DeFi ecosystem on Venom means limited composability and exit liquidity for liquid staking tokens
- •Dependency on Venom chain health — if the L0/L1 chain experiences issues, all staked assets and rewards are at risk
How VenomStake Compares to Peers
VenomStake ranks #72 of 86 Liquid Staking protocols (bottom quartile — among the riskiest). At a risk score of 40/100, it's 8 points riskier than the sector average of 32/100.
Adjacent peers: NEOPIN Staking (C+, 39/100) is ranked just safer, and Lombard Finance (C+, 41/100) is ranked just riskier.
See the full Liquid Staking sector leaderboard or the VenomStake vs Lombard Finance comparison.
Common Questions about VenomStake
Plain-English answers based on VenomStake's scores across Hindenrank's 8 risk dimensions. The highest-scoring (riskiest) dimension is Track Record (12/15).
Has VenomStake ever been hacked or exploited?
VenomStake has a documented incident history that materially raised its risk grade — the track record dimension scored 12/15, near the high end of the scale. Past exploits, governance failures, or contract issues are baked into this rating. Anyone considering deposits should review the incident details before allocating capital.
How much money is at stake in VenomStake?
VenomStake currently holds roughly $11M in user deposits. Smaller TVL means individual depositors carry a larger share of any loss event, and it can be harder to exit a position quickly during stress.
What's the worst-case scenario for VenomStake?
Hindenrank has identified specific collapse scenarios for VenomStake. The most prominent: "Venom Chain Instability Affecting Staked Assets". The trigger condition is Venom blockchain experiences consensus failure, chain halt, or critical bug in its relatively new mainnet. Reading through the full scenario list on the protocol page is the single best way to understand the actual failure modes — generic "smart contract risk" is rarely the thing that takes a protocol down.
Is VenomStake regulated or insured?
VenomStake has low regulatory exposure on Hindenrank's framework (3/10). The protocol is structured in a way that minimizes counterparty and jurisdiction concentration, though regulatory risk in crypto can change rapidly. No DeFi protocol carries FDIC-style insurance — even with low regulatory risk, depositors are not protected in the way bank customers are.
What are the biggest red flags for VenomStake?
Hindenrank's retail-focused risk audit flagged: Very new blockchain: Venom launched its mainnet in March 2024, making both the chain and VenomStake among the least battle-tested options in the liquid staking space. New chains are more likely to experience technical issues. Limited documentation: VenomStake's smart contract details, fee structure, and security audit information are not comprehensively documented publicly, making it harder to assess the protocol's safety. Small ecosystem: The Venom DeFi ecosystem is still developing, which means your liquid staking token may have limited utility beyond basic staking — reducing the main advantage of liquid staking over native staking.
Should beginners deposit into VenomStake?
VenomStake's C+ grade puts it in the elevated-risk band. This is not a beginner-friendly protocol. Anyone depositing here should treat the position as speculative and avoid concentrating significant savings in it.
How does VenomStake compare to safer Liquid Staking alternatives?
VenomStake is one protocol in Hindenrank's Liquid Staking coverage. The safest Liquid Staking protocols on the leaderboard tend to share three traits: a long incident-free track record, conservative mechanism design, and high-quality public documentation. Compare VenomStake against the full Liquid Staking ranking before committing capital.
For the full 8-dimension score breakdown, the radar chart, and dependency graph, see the VenomStake risk report.
Read the Full VenomStake Risk Report
This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 1 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.
View Full Report →Get risk alerts before it's too late
Weekly grade changes, downgrade alerts, and new protocol risk findings. Free.