Aftermath Finance vs SUNSwap V3: Risk & Value Comparison
Aftermath Finance
SUNSwap V3
Sector
DEX
DEX
Risk Score
27/100
27/100
Risk Grade
B
B
Value Score
41/100
42/100
Value Grade
C-
C-
TVL
$4M
$176M
FDV
—
$376M
Mechanisms
7
5
Interactions
5
4
Quadrant
Safe but Stale
Safe but Stale
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Aftermath Finance
0
SUNSwap V3
2
Interaction Severity/ 20
Aftermath Finance
8
SUNSwap V3
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
Aftermath Finance
2
SUNSwap V3
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
Aftermath Finance
3
SUNSwap V3
3
Track Record/ 15
Aftermath Finance
3
SUNSwap V3
3
Scale Exposure/ 10
Aftermath Finance
0
SUNSwap V3
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Aftermath Finance
4
SUNSwap V3
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Aftermath Finance
7
SUNSwap V3
4
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Aftermath Finance
10
SUNSwap V3
10
Token Distribution/ 25
Aftermath Finance
5
SUNSwap V3
8
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Aftermath Finance
14
SUNSwap V3
12
Competitive Moat/ 25
Aftermath Finance
12
SUNSwap V3
12
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (27/100), making them equally risky.
SUNSwap V3 has stronger value accrual (C-, 42/100) compared to C- (41/100).