Alchemix V3 vs Harvest Finance: Risk & Value Comparison
Alchemix V3
Harvest Finance
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
46/100
46/100
Risk Grade
C
C
Value Score
43/100
37/100
Value Grade
C
C-
TVL
$31M
$13M
FDV
$6M
$4M
Mechanisms
8
6
Interactions
6
5
Quadrant
Neutral
Neutral
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Alchemix V3
9
Harvest Finance
0
Interaction Severity/ 20
Alchemix V3
13
Harvest Finance
10
Oracle Surface/ 10
Alchemix V3
6
Harvest Finance
5
Documentation Quality/ 10
Alchemix V3
2
Harvest Finance
4
Track Record/ 15
Alchemix V3
5
Harvest Finance
15
Scale Exposure/ 10
Alchemix V3
3
Harvest Finance
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Alchemix V3
4
Harvest Finance
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Alchemix V3
4
Harvest Finance
7
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Alchemix V3
5
Harvest Finance
9
Token Distribution/ 25
Alchemix V3
16
Harvest Finance
11
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Alchemix V3
8
Harvest Finance
8
Competitive Moat/ 25
Alchemix V3
14
Harvest Finance
9
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (46/100), making them equally risky.
Alchemix V3 has stronger value accrual (C, 43/100) compared to C- (37/100).