Alchemix V3 vs Plasma Saving Vaults: Risk & Value Comparison
Alchemix V3
Plasma Saving Vaults
Sector
Yield
Yield
Risk Score
46/100
46/100
Risk Grade
C
C
Value Score
43/100
35/100
Value Grade
C
C-
TVL
$31M
$34M
FDV
$6M
$976M
Mechanisms
8
5
Interactions
6
4
Quadrant
Neutral
Neutral
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Alchemix V3
9
Plasma Saving Vaults
6
Interaction Severity/ 20
Alchemix V3
13
Plasma Saving Vaults
10
Oracle Surface/ 10
Alchemix V3
6
Plasma Saving Vaults
3
Documentation Quality/ 10
Alchemix V3
2
Plasma Saving Vaults
3
Track Record/ 15
Alchemix V3
5
Plasma Saving Vaults
5
Scale Exposure/ 10
Alchemix V3
3
Plasma Saving Vaults
7
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Alchemix V3
4
Plasma Saving Vaults
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Alchemix V3
4
Plasma Saving Vaults
8
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Alchemix V3
5
Plasma Saving Vaults
10
Token Distribution/ 25
Alchemix V3
16
Plasma Saving Vaults
8
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Alchemix V3
8
Plasma Saving Vaults
9
Competitive Moat/ 25
Alchemix V3
14
Plasma Saving Vaults
8
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (46/100), making them equally risky.
Alchemix V3 has stronger value accrual (C, 43/100) compared to C- (35/100).