MUX Perps vs Ostium: Risk & Value Comparison

MUX Perps logoMUX Perps

Derivatives

Risk

B

Value

D+

Dead Money

Ostium logoOstium

Derivatives

Risk

C+

Value

C-

Neutral

MUX Perps
Ostium
Sector
Derivatives
Derivatives
Risk Score
27/100
36/100
Risk Grade
B
C+
Value Score
28/100
42/100
Value Grade
D+
C-
TVL
$10M
$55M
FDV
$13M
$250M
Mechanisms
6
5
Interactions
4
4
Quadrant
Dead Money
Neutral

Risk Dimension Comparison

Mechanism Novelty/ 15
MUX Perps
0
Ostium
6
Interaction Severity/ 20
MUX Perps
5
Ostium
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
MUX Perps
5
Ostium
5
Documentation Quality/ 10
MUX Perps
4
Ostium
2
Track Record/ 15
MUX Perps
2
Ostium
6
Scale Exposure/ 10
MUX Perps
3
Ostium
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
MUX Perps
5
Ostium
3
Protocol Vitality/ 10
MUX Perps
3
Ostium
3

Value Dimension Comparison

Fee Capture/ 25
MUX Perps
8
Ostium
12
Token Distribution/ 25
MUX Perps
8
Ostium
10
Emission Sustainability/ 25
MUX Perps
5
Ostium
10
Competitive Moat/ 25
MUX Perps
7
Ostium
10

Verdict

MUX Perps is the safer protocol with a risk score of 27/100 (B) compared to 36/100 (C+).

Ostium has stronger value accrual (C-, 42/100) compared to D+ (28/100).