Tangible RWA vs Valos: Risk & Value Comparison
Tangible RWA
Valos
Sector
RWA
RWA
Risk Score
48/100
48/100
Risk Grade
C
C
Value Score
42/100
39/100
Value Grade
C-
C-
TVL
$43M
$112M
FDV
—
—
Mechanisms
7
4
Interactions
6
3
Quadrant
Neutral
Neutral
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Tangible RWA
8
Valos
7
Interaction Severity/ 20
Tangible RWA
10
Valos
11
Oracle Surface/ 10
Tangible RWA
5
Valos
3
Documentation Quality/ 10
Tangible RWA
3
Valos
6
Track Record/ 15
Tangible RWA
10
Valos
6
Scale Exposure/ 10
Tangible RWA
3
Valos
5
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Tangible RWA
6
Valos
7
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Tangible RWA
3
Valos
3
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Tangible RWA
12
Valos
10
Token Distribution/ 25
Tangible RWA
12
Valos
5
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Tangible RWA
10
Valos
13
Competitive Moat/ 25
Tangible RWA
8
Valos
11
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (48/100), making them equally risky.
Tangible RWA has stronger value accrual (C-, 42/100) compared to C- (39/100).