776 protocols rated$360.8B TVL tracked14 sectors

Puffer Finance Alternatives: Similar Restaking Protocols Compared

Puffer Finance carries a risk grade of C (46/100). Below are 22 Restaking protocols ranked by safety — from safest to riskiest — as potential alternatives.

Current Protocol

Restaking

Risk

C

Value

D

TVL

$63M

Safety analysis →Investment analysis →

AlternativeRiskValueTVL

1

Mellow ProtocolSafer

B

C-

$3,000

2

SwellSafer

B-

C-

$68M

3

B-

C

$24M

4

b14gSafer

B-

D

$205M

5

EigenLayerSafer

B-

D+

$15.3B

6

Mantle RestakingSafer

B-

C-

$156M

7

B-

D

$17M

8

KarakSafer

C+

D

$40M

9

Jito RestakingSafer

C+

C

$17M

10

SolvBTC LSTsSafer

C+

D

$81M

11

Bedrock uniETHSafer

C+

D

$23M

12

OpenGDP Shared SecuritySafer

C+

D-

$30M

13

Pell NetworkSafer

C+

C

$200M

14

EigenCloudSafer

C+

C+

$8.9B

15

FragmetricSafer

C+

D-

$15M

16

C+

D

$432M

17

Lombard LBTCSafer

C

D+

$716M

18

Swell Liquid RestakingSafer

C

C-

$33M

19

C

D+

$42M

20

C

D+

$1.2B

21

Babylon Protocol

C

B-

$1.8B

22

C-

B-

$5.8B

Is Puffer Finance safe?Is Puffer Finance a good investment?Puffer Finance risk profile →