Is Gauntlet Safe?
Risk Grade: B- (35/100)
Gauntlet is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.
Moderate risk — competent risk manager with strong institutional moat, but single-firm dependency across $2B+ in curated vaults and dual-role governance conflict-of-interest are concentration concerns
A risk management firm that uses simulations to set safety parameters (collateral ratios, lending limits) for DeFi protocols like Morpho and Compound, while directly managing $2B+ in curated lending vaults across 80+ markets. Institutional clients include Gemini, Wirex, BTCS (Nasdaq-listed), and SCRYPT (Swiss FINMA-regulated). Its B- grade reflects strong track record offset by the concentration of control in one firm's models and governance conflict-of-interest concerns.
TVL
$1.7B
Mechanisms
5
Interactions
6
Value Grade
C+
Key Risks for Gauntlet Users
If Gauntlet's models fail to predict a black swan crash, the safety settings on Morpho and Compound could all be wrong at the same time, causing billions in bad debt across 80+ curated vaults
One company controls the risk settings for major lending protocols in DeFi. If Gauntlet is compromised or bribed, an attacker could drain multiple protocols simultaneously
Gauntlet gets paid for preventing losses, creating pressure to be either too conservative (hurting your returns) or too aggressive (risking catastrophic failure)
Top Risk Factors
- •Gauntlet's simulation-based risk models curate $2B+ in vault AUM and inform parameters for protocols with $35B+ in monitored assets — models calibrated on historical data may fail catastrophically during tail events outside observed volatility ranges
- •Centralized parameter control creates a single point of failure; Gauntlet simultaneously curates its own Morpho vaults and advises Compound DAO on protocol parameters, creating governance conflict-of-interest concerns that community critics have raised publicly
- •Performance-based incentive model (renewed Sept 2025) aligns Gauntlet with preventing insolvencies but creates moral hazard: overly conservative parameters reduce capital efficiency across 80+ curated vaults, while overly aggressive parameters risk catastrophic failure at $2B+ AUM scale
Risk Score Breakdown
Gauntlet's highest risk area is Scale Exposure (7/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 35/100 score:
Read the Full Gauntlet Risk Report
This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.
View Full Report →Considering an investment?