Gauntlet vs Instadapp: Risk & Value Comparison

Gauntlet logoGauntlet

DeFi

Risk

C+

Value

C+

Neutral

Instadapp logoInstadapp

DeFi

Risk

C+

Value

C-

Neutral

Gauntlet
Instadapp
Sector
DeFi
DeFi
Risk Score
36/100
36/100
Risk Grade
C+
C+
Value Score
51/100
41/100
Value Grade
C+
C-
TVL
$929M
$1.8B
FDV
$175M
Mechanisms
5
8
Interactions
6
6
Quadrant
Neutral
Neutral

Risk Dimension Comparison

Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Gauntlet
3
Instadapp
9
Interaction Severity/ 20
Gauntlet
9
Instadapp
6
Oracle Surface/ 10
Gauntlet
0
Instadapp
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
Gauntlet
2
Instadapp
2
Track Record/ 15
Gauntlet
6
Instadapp
2
Scale Exposure/ 10
Gauntlet
7
Instadapp
7
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Gauntlet
5
Instadapp
2
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Gauntlet
4
Instadapp
6

Value Dimension Comparison

Fee Capture/ 25
Gauntlet
8
Instadapp
12
Token Distribution/ 25
Gauntlet
6
Instadapp
5
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Gauntlet
16
Instadapp
8
Competitive Moat/ 25
Gauntlet
21
Instadapp
16

Verdict

Both protocols have identical risk scores (36/100), making them equally risky.

Gauntlet has stronger value accrual (C+, 51/100) compared to C- (41/100).