Is Hyperbeat LST Safe?

|Liquid Staking
B-

Risk Grade: B- (33/100)

Hyperbeat LST is rated as moderate risk — some novel mechanisms, generally well-understood.

Moderate risk — well-audited LST with strong backers, but the novel CoreWriter bridge and short track record warrant caution.

Hyperbeat LST (beHYPE) is a liquid staking token for HYPE on Hyperliquid, built in partnership with Ether.fi. It lets users earn staking rewards while keeping their tokens liquid for use in DeFi. With $14M TVL and three independent audits, the protocol is early-stage but backed by $5.2M in seed funding from Electric Capital and Coinbase Ventures.

TVL

$16M

Mechanisms

6

Interactions

5

Value Grade

D+

Key Risks for Hyperbeat LST Users

1.

The CoreWriter bridge connecting HyperCore and HyperEVM is a novel component with limited battle-testing; a bridge vulnerability could affect all deposited funds

2.

The protocol launched in 2025 and initially used a multisig-secured vault before transitioning to smart contracts, meaning the fully automated system has limited production history

3.

beHYPE delegates equally to all validators, so a single poorly-performing validator's slashing penalty affects all holders proportionally

Top Risk Factors

  • CoreWriter bridge layer introduces novel complexity between HyperCore and HyperEVM, with limited battle-testing in adversarial conditions
  • Protocol is less than one year old with a multisig-secured vault phase preceding the full smart contract deployment
  • Validator set delegation is pooled equally across all active validators, meaning poor-performing or malicious validators receive the same stake allocation

Risk Score Breakdown

Hyperbeat LST's highest risk area is Vitality Risk (7/10). Here's how each dimension contributes to the overall 33/100 score:

Mechanism Novelty3/15
Interaction Severity5/20
Oracle Surface2/10
Documentation Gaps4/10
Track Record6/15
Scale Exposure3/10
Regulatory Risk3/10
Vitality Risk7/10

Read the Full Hyperbeat LST Risk Report

This protocol has 2 collapse scenarios. 2 high-severity interaction risks identified. See the full mechanism classification, interaction matrix, and deep-dive recommendations.

View Full Report →

Related Liquid Staking Safety Analyses

Related Liquid Staking Investment Analyses

Ratings use Hindenrank's eight-dimension risk rubric. Lower score = lower risk. Grades range from A (safest) to F (riskiest). This is not financial advice.