Gauntlet vs SoSoValue Indexes: Risk & Value Comparison
Gauntlet
SoSoValue Indexes
Sector
DeFi
DeFi
Risk Score
36/100
36/100
Risk Grade
C+
C+
Value Score
51/100
25/100
Value Grade
C+
D
TVL
$929M
$95M
FDV
—
—
Mechanisms
5
5
Interactions
6
4
Quadrant
Neutral
Weak
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
Gauntlet
3
SoSoValue Indexes
3
Interaction Severity/ 20
Gauntlet
9
SoSoValue Indexes
5
Oracle Surface/ 10
Gauntlet
0
SoSoValue Indexes
5
Documentation Quality/ 10
Gauntlet
2
SoSoValue Indexes
4
Track Record/ 15
Gauntlet
6
SoSoValue Indexes
6
Scale Exposure/ 10
Gauntlet
7
SoSoValue Indexes
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
Gauntlet
5
SoSoValue Indexes
4
Protocol Vitality/ 10
Gauntlet
4
SoSoValue Indexes
6
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
Gauntlet
8
SoSoValue Indexes
8
Token Distribution/ 25
Gauntlet
6
SoSoValue Indexes
6
Emission Sustainability/ 25
Gauntlet
16
SoSoValue Indexes
5
Competitive Moat/ 25
Gauntlet
21
SoSoValue Indexes
6
Verdict
Both protocols have identical risk scores (36/100), making them equally risky.
Gauntlet has stronger value accrual (C+, 51/100) compared to D (25/100).