Fuel Network Alternatives: Similar L2 Protocols Compared

Fuel Network carries a risk grade of C (45/100) and ranks #35 of 37 rated L2 protocols. Below are 36 L2 protocols ranked by safety — from safest to riskiest. 34 of these protocols score lower (safer) than Fuel Network, and 2 score higher (riskier).

The single safest alternative is Xai (B, 24/100 — 21 points safer than Fuel Network). See the Fuel Network vs Xai comparison to weigh the tradeoffs.

Current Protocol

L2

Risk

C

Value

C+

TVL

$45M

Safety analysis →Investment analysis →

AlternativeRiskValueTVL

1

XaiSafer

B

D-

$81,000

2

B

C-

$2.0B

3

B

C+

$86M

4

Abstract ChainSafer

B

C

$38M

5

B

D+

—

6

CeloSafer

B-

D+

$200M

7

KintoSafer

B-

C

$672,000

8

B-

C-

—

9

TaikoSafer

B-

C-

$4M

10

MezoSafer

B-

D

$48M

11

Mode NetworkSafer

B-

C-

$7M

12

Astar NetworkSafer

B-

D-

$30M

13

BaseSafer

B-

C+

$2.8B

14

Hemi NetworkSafer

B-

C-

$2M

15

B-

D+

$8,000

16

Corn NetworkSafer

B-

C

$100M

17

C+

C+

$264,000

18

Immutable XSafer

C+

D

$570,000

19

LineaSafer

C+

D+

$387M

20

C+

C-

$24,000

21

C+

C

$252M

22

C+

D+

$511M

23

ZoraSafer

C+

C-

—

24

Aztec NetworkSafer

C+

D-

—

25

C+

C

$234M

26

C+

C-

$473M

27

Merlin ChainSafer

C+

D-

$100M

28

C+

C+

$93M

29

Manta NetworkSafer

C

D-

$50M

30

Nexus NetworkSafer

C

C

—

31

C

D-

$6M

32

ZKsync EraSafer

C

D+

$100M

33

BlastSafer

C

C-

$76M

34

C

D-

$50M

35

BOB (Build on Bitcoin)

C

C

$180M

36

C

D-

—

Is Fuel Network safe?Is Fuel Network a good investment?Fuel Network risk profile →