NEAR Intents vs Stargate V1: Risk & Value Comparison
NEAR Intents
Stargate V1
Sector
Bridge
Bridge
Risk Score
27/100
30/100
Risk Grade
B
B-
Value Score
42/100
46/100
Value Grade
C-
C
TVL
$63M
$11M
FDV
—
$32,654
Mechanisms
6
6
Interactions
5
5
Quadrant
Safe but Stale
Safe but Stale
Risk Dimension Comparison
Mechanism Novelty/ 15
NEAR Intents
3
Stargate V1
3
Interaction Severity/ 20
NEAR Intents
6
Stargate V1
5
Oracle Surface/ 10
NEAR Intents
5
Stargate V1
2
Documentation Quality/ 10
NEAR Intents
2
Stargate V1
2
Track Record/ 15
NEAR Intents
3
Stargate V1
3
Scale Exposure/ 10
NEAR Intents
3
Stargate V1
3
Regulatory Risk/ 10
NEAR Intents
2
Stargate V1
3
Protocol Vitality/ 10
NEAR Intents
3
Stargate V1
9
Value Dimension Comparison
Fee Capture/ 25
NEAR Intents
5
Stargate V1
12
Token Distribution/ 25
NEAR Intents
15
Stargate V1
12
Emission Sustainability/ 25
NEAR Intents
12
Stargate V1
10
Competitive Moat/ 25
NEAR Intents
10
Stargate V1
12
Verdict
NEAR Intents is the safer protocol with a risk score of 27/100 (B) compared to 30/100 (B-).
Stargate V1 has stronger value accrual (C, 46/100) compared to C- (42/100).