Realms Alternatives: Similar DeFi Protocols Compared

Realms carries a risk grade of B+ (19/100) and ranks #2 of 68 rated DeFi protocols. Below are 67 DeFi protocols ranked by safety — from safest to riskiest. 1 of these protocols score lower (safer) than Realms, and 66 score higher (riskier).

The single safest alternative is Ethereum Name Service (B+, 18/100 — 1 points safer than Realms). See the Realms vs Ethereum Name Service comparison to weigh the tradeoffs.

Current Protocol

DeFi

Risk

B+

Value

F

TVL

$42M

Safety analysis →Investment analysis →

AlternativeRiskValueTVL

1

Ethereum Name ServiceSafer

B+

C

—

2

B

D

$303M

3

Arrakis Modular

B

D

$81M

4

B

D+

—

5

B

D-

$67M

6

B

C-

—

7

B-

D-

$58M

8

B-

D+

$89M

9

B-

D

—

10

B-

D+

$93M

11

B-

D+

$12M

12

B-

C+

$795M

13

B-

C+

—

14

Steakhouse Financial

B-

B-

$1.4B

15

B-

D+

$22M

16

B-

C-

$20M

17

B-

D+

$15M

18

Mantle Index Four Fund

B-

C-

$143M

19

B-

D+

$4M

20

CatFee Staking Vault

B-

F

$18M

21

B-

C-

$15M

22

B-

C+

$22M

23

B-

C-

—

24

B-

D

$138,000

25

Metronome Synth

B-

D

$26M

26

B-

C

$80M

27

B-

C-

$451M

28

B-

D-

$14M

29

B-

C-

$24M

30

B-

D

$24M

31

B-

D+

$1.5B

32

C+

C+

$929M

33

C+

C-

$1.8B

34

SoSoValue Indexes

C+

D

$95M

35

C+

D+

$506,000

36

C+

C-

$9M

37

C+

C-

$700M

38

C+

C-

—

39

C+

C-

—

40

C+

C-

$23M

41

C+

D+

$39M

42

C+

D

$110M

43

C+

D

—

44

C+

C+

$106M

45

Theo Straddle Vaults

C+

D

$5M

46

Treehouse Protocol

C+

C-

$114M

47

C+

D-

$73M

48

C+

C-

$6M

49

C+

C-

$100M

50

RedStone Oracle

C+

C+

$700,000

51

C+

F

—

52

Superfluid Finance

C+

C-

$5M

53

C+

C-

$572M

54

Adrastea Validator

C+

D

$20M

55

C+

D

$274M

56

C+

D-

$13M

57

C+

C-

$15M

58

C+

D+

$6M

59

C

D-

$6M

60

C

C-

$237M

61

C

D

$9M

62

C

C+

—

63

C

C-

$29M

64

Virtuals Protocol

C

C+

—

65

C-

D+

$11M

66

C-

D

—

67

D

F

—

Is Realms safe?Is Realms a good investment?Realms risk profile →