Home/Methodology/Documentation Quality

Documentation Quality

Inverted score — higher means worse documentation. Evaluates audit coverage, technical docs quality, and transparency of protocol operations.

Max score: 10811 protocols rated

Worst Offenders

Top 20 protocols with the highest documentation quality scores.

#ProtocolDocumentation Quality ScoreOverall Grade
1GoldFinger10 / 10C
2FstSwap10 / 10B-
3Goose9 / 10C
4Truebit8 / 10D
5Radiant Capital8 / 10D+
6TrustedVolumes8 / 10D+
7Lolik Liquid Staking8 / 10C
8Saphyre V38 / 10C+
9USD.AI7 / 10D
10Aster7 / 10D+
11CrossCurve7 / 10D+
12Piku DAO7 / 10D+
13Cetus Protocol7 / 10C-
14Everclear7 / 10C-
15AILayer Farm7 / 10C-
16Vesta Equity7 / 10C-
17MegaETH7 / 10C
18Canopy7 / 10C
19PulseX V17 / 10C
20Loopscale7 / 10C

Best Performers

Top 10 protocols with the lowest documentation quality scores.

#ProtocolDocumentation Quality ScoreOverall Grade
1Stellar DEX0 / 10B+
2Loopring0 / 10B
3DeepBook V30 / 10B
4Frax Swap0 / 10B
5Ethereum1 / 10B+
6Uniswap V21 / 10B+
7Uniswap V31 / 10B+
8XRPL DEX1 / 10B+
9sDAI1 / 10B+
10Paxos Gold1 / 10B+

Score Distribution

How 811 protocols distribute across documentation quality score ranges.

0–3
294
4–5
458
6–8
51
9–10
8

Why Documentation Quality Matters

Poor documentation signals either rushed development or intentional opacity. Well-documented protocols are easier to audit, harder to exploit, and more trustworthy.

Other Risk Dimensions